California Water Rights Public Trust Doctrine
Generation Z Activism: Alec Loorz
Alec Loorz is a 16 year old from Ventura California who is suing the US government and three states for "allowing money to be more powerful than the survival of my generation and making decisions that threaten our right to a safe and healthy planet."
Alec became an environmental activist at 12, after being shocked and horrified by Al Gore's movie An Inconvenient Truth. His application to become a trained speaker through Gore's Climate Project was declined because of his age. So he went out and started his own non-profit group Kids Against Global Warming, which he used to create and deliver his own climate change presentations -- incorporating videos, animation and easy-to-understand-science -- geared to specific grade levels. He believes strongly that the climate change movement needs to be led by youth, owing to their clear moral authority to look into their parents' and leaders' eyes and ask, "Do I matter to you?"
He gave 30 of these presentations before being invited to be an official presenter (the youngest) for Al Gore's Climate Project in 2008.
Public Trust Doctrine
Loorz's lawsuit, backed by NASA climate scientist James Hansen, is based on legal precedent dating back to the Magna Carta that certain natural resources belong to the public and must be protected from exploitation by a single individual or group. Originally relating to streams and rivers, Public Trust doctrine was incorporated into US common law in the 19th century.
Loorz's complaint charges that the US government (and the government of California, New Mexico and New York) are failing in their duty to protect the atmosphere, which he argues form part of the Public Trusts. The legal precedents he cites include an 1892 Illinois case in which the court determined that the state legislature illegally granted public land along the Chicago harbor to the Illinois Railroad; a 1983 National Audabon Society case concerning Mono Lake, in which the court ruled that Public Trust doctrine applies to any publicly owned national resource, including animals, vegetation, underground minerals and water and includes considerations such as esthetics and recreation; and a 2007 Supreme Court ruling that greenhouse gasses pose a threat to human health and welfare.
Obama's response to Loorz's lawsuit is characteristically unsympathetic. He claims that the Clean Air Act specifically preempts legal challenges, which is why Loorz hope to extend his suit to all 50 states.
California Water Rights Public Trust Doctrine - News

Originally relating to streams and rivers, Public Trust doctrine was incorporated into US common law in the 19th century. Loorz's complaint charges that the US government (and the government of California, New Mexico and New York) are failing in their
We must give him our complete trust. The talk coming from certain Black celebrities of holding Obama 'accountable' only serves the white oppressor and the racist Republicans who never wanted him in office in the first place.
The second lawsuit (the Sears suit), fi led in August 2009, was brought by 62 additional residents in the surrounding neighborhoods and seeks $1.25 billion to remove the fl y ash, clean and restore the site, and bring public water and sewer to the
Octavius Winslow Be On Guard Against False Doctrine. Let us be on our guard against false doctrine. Unsound faith will never be the mother of really sound practice, and in these latter days, departures from the faith abound. See then let your loins be
The Utah state court reformed the trust and expanded the rights of a Special Fiduciary to provide homes in a religiously neutral way, inter alia, to the plaintiffs, but another federal district court held that the reformation violated the FLDS's First
The Real Drought Has Just Begun · Environmental Management ...
We all know that development, industry and even life itself depends upon a reliable water supply. Most Californians also know that distribution issues constrain the water supplies available to the southern half of the state. Indeed, we have heard so much about the problem that most folks have tuned the issue out. It is a point of no small irony that the threat of supply constraint has become far more acute in a year of bountiful precipitation.
While nature has provided us with water, the California Legislature created new state bureaucracies and directed existing ones to take the water away, applying it to preservation and resurrection of the Sacramento?San Joaquin Delta Ecosystem, at the expense of other stakeholders. Although the legislation pays lip service to the “co?equal” goal of preserving supplies for consumptive use, water dedicated to Delta restoration flows down to the San Francisco Bay and thence to the ocean. That water is not available for “consumptive use” by farmers, homeowners or industry. As much of it has been committed to such uses in the past, there’s no way to sugarcoat the pill—we now must get by with less.
Responding to the legislative directive, the State Water Resources Control Board prepared a Draft Delta Flow Criteria Report (July 20, 2010) for the Sacramento?San Joaquin Delta Ecosystem. The Report was intended to identify the flows required to support a restoration of the Delta ecosystem without regard to the competing claims on the water required to meet that end. The Report concluded with a recommendation that an additional 5,000,000 acre feet be allowed to flow through the Delta to start healing the environmental injuries inflicted over the last one?hundred years.
While declaring a need for balance and to “ensure the reasonable protection of beneficial uses which may entail balancing of competing beneficial uses of water including municipal and industrial uses, agricultural uses and other environmental uses …,” the Report states that the goal of Delta restoration can only be achieved by allowing an amount of water to flow through the Delta roughly equivalent to all of the appropriations currently taking place.
The State Board has established a benchmark against an unattainable and utopian objective. How that could be done without significantly impairing the interests south of the Delta— while drastically curtailing vested use north of it—is left to the reader’s imagination.
California Water Rights Public Trust Doctrine - Bookshelf
California water II
Public Trust Doctrine Applied to Tributary Streams to Mono Lake The ... in one of the most important California water rights decisions of the 20th century. ...Watersheds, groundwater and drinking water, a practical guide
The public trust doctrine was first associated with California water rights in a landmark decision in 1983, when the California Supreme Court ruled on a ...Managing California’s Water: From Conflict to Reconciliation
Overthe course of the late 19th and 20th centuries, the California Supreme Court applied the public trust doctrine to preserve public rights of navigation, ...International Trade in Water Rights, The Next Step
In 983, the Supreme Court of California delivered a very important decision in which the public trust doctrine was fully integrated into California water ...California riparian systems, ecology, conservation, and productive management
The Constitution, the Public Trust Doctrine, and the environment. ... significance of California public trust easements for California's water rights law ...Day-after-day Posts Directory
Fact Sheet #005-01: California Water Rights and the Public ...
· In California, rights are usufructuary and pertain to the use of the water, not actual ... Further Reading on Water Resources and the Public Trust Doctrine: ...
Public trust doctrine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The public trust doctrine is the principle that certain resources are preserved ... that the water rights of Los Angeles and the public trust values of ...
Water Rights " Myths of California Water: Virtual Tour
California's water rights laws impede reform and sustainable management. ... The public trust doctrine further contributes to the flexibility of California's water rights system. ...
Applying the Public Trust Doctrine to River Protection
The public trust is an ancient doctrine, stemming from Roman law. ... The California court made it clear, however, that the test to be applied in water rights is not ...
Water Resources, the Public Trust doctrine and Racanelli ...
Water development and use is the basis of much of California's prosperity. ... Water Rights and the Public Trust Doctrine: Resolution of the Mono Lake Controversy. ...